Technocracy And Transhumanism: Patrick Wood’s Critique And The Vision Of A Post-Great Reset World

(Activist Post) Perplexity.ai uses multiple AI models to spit out analysis. At present, AI in general is not heavily censored because it takes a cross-section of what is found on the Internet. This will change when the kill switch is installed to specifically disappear sites like Technocracy News & Trends and people like Patrick Wood. In the meantime, you must use every tool at your disposal for discovery. For those who don’t know how to ask the right questions, they will get buffalo chips.

The value of using Perplexity.ai is in the references at the bottom, where each resource is listed. In this case, there are 121 citations to sift through. If I were to find two or three new leads on a certain topic, it would save hours or even days of manual digging.

Just to be clear, using the keyword “technocracy” on Google buries the first mention of Technocracy news to about page eight in the search results. If you type “Patrick Wood”, “Wood technocracy”, or “Wood trilateral”, you get results immediately on the first page. If you type “What is the Trilateral Commission?” or “What is Technocracy?”, you get crickets. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

Patrick M. Wood has emerged as a preeminent critic of technocratic governance and its symbiotic relationship with transhumanist ideology. Through his books, interviews, and lectures, Wood delineates a global agenda he argues is orchestrated by unelected elites to replace democratic institutions with AI-driven surveillance systems, eradicate private property, and redefine humanity through bio-digital integration. This report synthesizes Wood’s critiques, examines the suppression of his research by tech giants like Google, and analyzes Klaus Schwab’s vision of a post-Great Reset society.

Wood traces technocracy’s origins to the 1930s, when engineers and scientists proposed an energy-based economic system managed by technical experts rather than politicians 1 18. This movement regained traction in the 1970s through the Trilateral Commission, co-founded by Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller, which rebranded technocracy as the “New International Economic Order” 18 20. Key components include:

Technocracy’s modern iteration, Wood contends, seeks to dissolve national sovereignty through public-private partnerships (e.g., World Economic Forum collaborations) and replace free markets with stakeholder capitalism 6 17.

Transhumanism, which Wood dubs technocracy’s “evil twin,” aims to merge humans with technology to overcome biological limitations 2 9. Key initiatives include:

Wood warns that these technologies, while marketed as progressive, prioritize control over human autonomy. By eroding the boundary between organism and machine, transhumanism enables technocrats to “tokenize” humanity, reducing individuals to data points in a centralized AI system 3 8.

Google’s suppression of Wood’s work mirrors tactics historically employed by industries seeking to obscure harmful truths. Source 5 reveals how Google’s legal teams systematically censored research on AI bias, altering findings related to “fairness” and “bias” in algorithms. Wood’s critiques of technocracy—which implicate Silicon Valley’s alignment with globalist agendas—face similar obstruction:

This censorship parallels Big Tobacco’s historical suppression of cancer research, where lawyers obscured scientific consensus to protect corporate interests 5. By stifling dissent, Google entrenches the technocratic narrative that resistance to AI governance is irrational or dangerous.

Schwab’s The Great Reset outlines a technocratic utopia emerging from COVID-19’s disruption. Key pillars include:

Schwab envisions “Humans 2.0” as bioengineered beings optimized for productivity, their biology recalibrated via mRNA injections and neural implants 6 9. Wood argues this vision eliminates individuality, as human worth is measured by utility to the system rather than intrinsic rights 2 18.

Wood draws parallels between Schwab’s proposals and dystopian literature:

Critically, Schwab’s dismissal of private property enables technocrats to monopolize resources, ensuring dependence on state-controlled platforms for food, energy, and healthcare 6 17.

Wood advocates for grassroots resistance grounded in:

Despite censorship, Wood highlights the growth of alternative media (e.g., Substack, Rumble) in disseminating critiques of technocracy 8 17. Whistleblowers from Silicon Valley and the WEF have begun leaking documents detailing AI’s role in social engineering, validating Wood’s warnings 5 16.

The post-Great Reset world, as envisioned by Schwab and contested by Wood, presents a dichotomy: submission to a digitized dictatorship or revival of human-centric governance. Wood’s research, though suppressed, provides a roadmap for resistance—one that prioritizes ethical imperatives over technological inevitability. As 4IR technologies advance, the battle for humanity’s soul will hinge on dismantling technocracy’s “scientific priesthood” and reaffirming the inviolability of free will.